Stockholm 221(g) Tracker: Wait Times

What Stockholm has asked for

Every document request recorded on a Stockholm 221(g) so far, grouped by type and most frequent first. Document types only — never anyone’s actual documents.

• Bank statements / financial evidence
• New medical exam
• public charge questionnaire
• self-support plan
• US job offers

1 of 11 tracked Stockholm cases were asked to submit by email.

Stockholm and the immigrant visa pause

At least one applicant who is not a plaintiff has received a case-specific instruction here. Last reported movement 2026-10-29.

First interviews are being rebooked: a K-1 (Norwegian beneficiary, not DCF) cancelled for 21 September was emailed a new date of 22 October on 8 October, and a second Stockholm K-1 first interview was rescheduled the same day. An early-October immigrant interview cancelled on 29 September and a 24 August K-1 are not yet reported rebooked. A 4 August immigrant case still awaits a decision; an 11 September questionnaire went unanswered. The 16 October court declaration, as summarised by applicants, cites a named plaintiff at Stockholm asked for a new medical and given a 22 October re-interview. 27 October: an IR1 documentarily qualified 2 April that never had an interview letter got an email saying its interview was cancelled and will be rescheduled; CEAC now shows In Transit to Stockholm. An IR1 qualified 5 May has heard nothing. Reported 30 October: an applicant who waited about seven and a half months got an interview date a couple of days earlier, described as expedited. 1 November: the IR1 qualified 2 April whose interview was cancelled on 27 October received an interview letter on 29 October for 25 November, without escalating; it reports another applicant qualified around 1 April got a letter the same week. 6 November, second-hand: two applicants documentarily qualified in early April are said to have received interview letters; only a couple of K-1 re-interviews have been reported otherwise. Reported 11 November: an EB-3 other workers applicant refused under 212(a)(4) sent a reconsideration memo with US job offers for both spouses and a support plan; the post acknowledged it, then answered a follow-up with the general training-initiative reply. CEAC still shows Refused.

Documentarily qualified and waiting for an interview? Add your DQ date, anonymously.

Full picture for this post, with its pause cases, cancellations and every digest mention: Stockholm immigrant visa pause status. Every post side by side: status by embassy.

Recent Stockholm case reports

Newest first, fully anonymized.